Why are some people in the Middle West Do not Like?
While Central Europe is not considered the eastern part of geographical Europe, their political commitment to the pact of the former Soviet Union led to the "oriental" fingerprint "of communism, which first materialized in Russia. Thus, the term "Europe" is often used also for "Central Europe". Do not slide into a platform, which is communism or what not is because in a practical premise of what history has shown us that it is inappropriate to discuss communism in a theoretical basis, if we do not consider that this ideology practically led to the development of Europe (torture, arrests, executions, etc.).
The propaganda of the Communists was based in search of an enemy within and this propaganda that hated everything that had originated in the West. They believed that socialism was only the first step to communism, but socialism was not communism, was only a step up (or down?). They had believed the money would be used in communism and that everyone would have free medical care, free education, etc. on the basis of these populist ideas, many people joined the communist party, but this was substantially different from the pre-war Germany, where Nazi ideology publicly stated their expectations all wrong. Those who joined the Communist Party were simply cheated.
The basic ideas Communism was based on the utopian philosophers who discussed social injustice and some proposed solutions. Marx was one of those utopians. But Utopians are Christians, as Teilhard de Chadrin and many others. If the "few" rule the world, its power is based solely on the abundance of money they possess, but his desire is only to expand their power, are the "capitalists", the "rich" in the system where capital has no obstacles to climb the heights astronomical. He befriended presidents and influential politicians for the good of their pockets. Every door opens for them, if it is a parliament or not. They may exercise pressure and influence the nature of the laws. Moreover, in the darkest corners and in the world, many people are starving and not even the most basic things to live. This social injustice is the basis for thinking the left-oriented.
As socialism developed in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, the Communists depraved their own people of basic human rights – no free elections, without private property, only personnel allowed – which could have a garden, a house, but not a truck or an airplane, or a factory.
Why are some people in the East do not like the West
Communists ruled half the world for nearly 70 years and also rule today in countries like China or Cuba. This ideology was correct on some points (only on a theoretical basis), rises in the capital in the hands of those who are the richest, who also own the media and television channels, and to publish things especially for the largest unique audience, as the money is most important to them. These media rarely cover minor issues. If people commit suicide, nobody cares, but if someone is tattooed from head to toe, you're invited.
I think it's OK to work, earn money, and prosper. But the practices of these "global companies" are such that, for example, who do not like competition and push it out of your space. This particular thing happened in a few mainstream computer magazines in Slovakia, where advertisers pay either, until articles about Linux disappeared. Is this freedom?
I will give a few examples: In the post-World War II (after the Second World War) Soviet Union aggressively attacked only three countries were Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968) and Afghanistan (1979).
Westerners have a side of this perception. They see the black and white stuff (not all of them, thick) and the Soviet Union was evil and that the U.S. was good.
The list of countries that the U.S. has been War is much higher in China (1945-46, 1950-53), Korea (1950-53), Guatemala (1954, 1967-69), Indonesia (1958), Cuba (1959-60), Belgian Congo (1964 ), Peru (1965), Laos (1964-73), Vietnam (1961-73), Cambodia (1969-70), Grenada (1983), Libya (1986), El Salvador (1980), Nicaragua (1980), Panama (1989) , Iraq (1991-99), Bosnia (1995), Sudan (1998), Yugoslavia (1999), and now in Afghanistan and Iraq.
What some people in the East believe is that if Belarus (his government was opposed by all European governments), for example, made friends with the West, all these rich companies to go there, bribing politicians and put more of natural resources and existing resources such as oil transit, power plants, etc in their pockets, and as "private" to dictate prices, but never for the benefit of the people living there. We hear constantly, too, on bribery in countries like Italy and other countries the EU. Corruption is the bread and butter.
Not that Lukashenko is good, but I give one example: swastika is an ancient symbol that the Nazi ideology abused here in Europe and worldwide. The European Union has a mouthful of human rights, but if you show swastika somewhere in Europe, the police arrested. The point is that if this symbol is really associated with Nazi propaganda, then it's okay to detain someone. EU politicians talk about China's abuse of human rights, known members of the Falun Gong movement in China are subject to abuse, but use swastika too and already had problems with it in Germany. First, Svastika is a Hindu symbol and it is not logical that one can not explain this to most Europeans. All mainstream media are simply owned by these advertisers and not let anyone tell you a different take on Belarus or swastika.
There is a demand for protection of svastika: http://www.petitiononline.com/Swastika/
but the EU does not care. Many journalists write that Lukashenko is a dictator and human rights are not preserved in Belarus, but unfortunately, do not see that human rights in Europe have many problems. There are situations where a citizen may feel to be under oppression. The biometric passport is one example. Fingerprints are taken on all of the criminals and many people may feel that their own state makes them criminals when they leave their country with these passports.
It is the "democracy moneycracy?
Richard Stallman, the famous propagator of the idea of free software, also supports this view. Governments need from us our most sensitive data, but there is no guarantee that these data are adequately protected. For example, in Slovakia, shall be identified with ID cards for each bank, even if you deposit a few euros. Under communism, such identification was not necessary, even with foreign currency the state was happy to receive foreign money. We have cases where the police have directly participated in criminal acts. What happens if I win the lottery and put several million in a bank? The police can get to my data, listen to my phone, or even a plan to blackmail me. Of course, not officially, but How can I protect myself if a police officer passed this information to the mafia? I have heard many similar stories from Italy, so they are certainly not the worst case. This is just one example.
Certainly not want to support Lukashenko, or any dictator, but if someone who constantly looks at television advertising, I think a little about how this man or woman view might change if he or she always looked out atrocities in the countries mentioned U.S. has been at war with.
I wish all the imperial power is to control others. There are no "good brothers" in this fight. Whether Russia, USA, China or the United Kingdom (colonization), these countries have all the blood on their hands. I object also to the ideas for the anti-Americanism. America is a beautiful country with good people, but many countries region outside the U.S. receive only a picture of her through these media. Americans should do something about it and fight for their liberties, as their constitution is in civil liberties. In other cases, the hatred of this beautiful country, even grow astronomically as the capital of the richer, the more greedy.
Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda, said that a lie repeated a thousand times becomes a truth. Why U.S. Government and United Nations human rights on the one hand, and deny the other hand, in support of the Hopi tribe wants their representation in the UN? Have they already made their own homeless? This tribe is famous for its prophecy swastika represented in the rock. If I buy a shirt with this prophecy, that the MEP attention each Once I could go to prison with this here in the EU?
http://www.prenocuj.sk/
About the Author
I write computer articles and like to travel:
Peruvian TV Watch Live at http://www.jumptv.com/?ref=dria